Terumah: Numbers

I open the door to my new office and step in. A cardboard box is in my hand. It has everything I need. I look at the room, with its two walls of tinted glass, its clean carpet and its massive desk. It smells of industrial carpet cleaner, generously applied. It seems to perfectly match the scent of my dry-cleaned suit.

I close the door behind me, so nobody can see me. And then I smile the broadest smile of my life.

I am finally where I belong.

I step forward and gingerly place the cardboard box on the clear table. I remove the lid and stare down at the contents. Leaning against one side is my laptop and power cord. I remove it and place it on the desk in front of my office chair. I line it up perfectly with the desk and run the wire through to the power port. I take a moment to examine my handiwork and then I return to the box.

I look again. Then I pull out a single sheet of laminated paper. I place it, face up, exactly two inches from the corner of the desk. It will be on the near right corner for those who enter my office. It too is lined up with the desk. Then, on the paper, I place an empty pill bottle, a candy bar with a sale sticker on it and a napkin with a diagram jotted down. All are lined up with one another, perpendicular to my laptop so I can see them easily when I work.

Finally, at the bottom of the box is a collection of over 1000 letters. They come in all shapes and sizes and colors. I pick them out, one by one, and slowly and methodically tape them to my new office walls. I line them up in a pattern I laid out on my computer before coming here.

It has taken me all day, but I am finally done. I lift the box from the table and place it near the door. Then I turn around and look again at the space.

My laptop is in position, but more importantly so are the other objects: the paper, candy car, pill bottle, napkin and letters.

I smile again. This is where I belong.

Finally, I am being recognized.

It has been a long road getting here.

When I was in grade school, I wanted to fit in. But I never managed to do so. When troupes of girls would start obsessing over fashion or a band or even one another, I would try to get involved. I would read up on the subject and maybe watch a video or two. I would prepare a few comments so I could seem to be interested. Then, when I got a chance, I’d join in a conversation. I’d say my piece. But moments later, invariably, everybody would either laugh at me or drift away.

I’d go home and cry. And then I’d try again. I’d adjust my approach, of course. I’d analyze the probabilities of different elements combining to realize the desired outcome: popularity, or at least acceptability.

Time after time, I’d keep trying. Time after time, I’d keep failing.

It seemed I didn’t know how to communicate with my peers.

It took me a while to realize that the real problem was that they didn’t know how to communicate with me. I didn’t realize that they were really interested in the band or the fashion or how they did their hair. I thought they were just pretending. I thought it was all some sort of social dance necessary to achieve popularity. I thought it was a means to an end. I didn’t realize the dance itself was the point.

I thought, I truly believed, that they were like me. I thought they saw the world as numbers and patterns and geometric relationships. I thought they watched others walk and pulled out patterns in their movements. I thought they also saw equations in their movements through the playground; in the ways they clumped and shifted. I thought they thought like I did.

But they didn’t.

It turned out I even dreamed differently than they did. Where they dreamed in images, I dreamed in formulas and integers and geometric relationships.

I had nothing in common with them. I was different from them. And so, over time, I pulled away from them. What I was interested in, they could not understand. And it seemed like the inverse was also true.

As I grew older, the differences only grew starker. As a child I consumed numbers. I read mathematics textbooks. I saw patterns around me. But, bit by bit, I began to create in numbers. Just as an artist would bring an image to life on a canvas, or a writer in words, I began to create in numbers. Patterns would speak to me, telling stories – capturing beauty only I seemed able to see and revealing truths others wanted to hide. I went through college this way. I got a degree in mathematics but the coursework was simple. Far more of my time was spent conjuring numerical realities that nobody but I seemed capable of appreciating.

I loved what I was doing. I loved the beauty of it. I loved the complexity. I loved the honesty. But I didn’t need to go college for any of it; I knew the math and I loved the numbers. But I didn’t belong. I wasn’t doing what I was meant for and I knew it. The one thing college gave me, that my art could not, was a job. My senior year, a professor of mine found me a position.

I was to be an analyst at the state government employee pension fund.

I expected I’d find my tribe there. I hoped to find my purpose.

But I didn’t. I didn’t know it at the time, but when I was hired, I was hired as a ‘diversity’ employee. I was considered disabled, autistic to be precise. I didn’t think I was disabled, but I did end up filling some sort of state quota. It was why I got the job. The fund was happy to hire me. People felt good having me around. But nobody really expected me to contribute much of anything. I was supposed to run routine reports and present them to management. I wasn’t meant to be tasked with anything too difficult. Of course, the jobs of my coworkers weren’t that much more advanced – although they may have disagreed.

It was all basic stuff done by basic people. Sure, the people were more geeky than the average, but even they didn’t see the world the way I did. And I was far from fulfilled.

The job turned from okay to worse when my mangers started explaining pension accounting to me. It didn’t take me long to ‘get’ what they were explaining. But I could not accept it. It seemed like the accounting was just ‘corrections’ piled on top of corrections. Excessively optimistic projections were combined with theoretical future makeup of shortfalls which were themselves additionally enhanced. The rise in healthcare costs was forecasted to become something magically brought under control. And all of it was combined to make a system that was terribly broken seem less so. Even with all the lies, it didn’t work. What we published were projections of shortfalls that were themselves incredibly optimistic. I was hired to help them lie.

But I couldn’t accept making the numbers lie. To me numbers were beauty and their beauty was being rotted away. I tried to bury my head. I tried to pretend it wasn’t happening. But I couldn’t. I could see the lies, the corruption of the truth of numbers, spreading. I could see pensioners and then society being slowly overwhelmed by the truth the numbers told. I could see everything falling apart.

Hunger in the streets. Elderly homelessness. Lack of medicines. All numbers as promises that turned out to be lies.

And there was nothing I could do.

After I understood the problem, I spent every waking hour thinking about it. I wanted to solve it. But I kept coming back to two realities. Either the truth of the numbers was accepted (in which case people’s lives unraveled now as the promises made to them shrank massively under their very eyes). Or the lies were continued, promises were paid out and those paid last were left with nothing at all.

There seemed to be no other options.

Even the greatest manager could not stop it. All they could hope to do was slow it down.

It all seemed so hopeless. Then, I was diagnosed with cancer.

When I took a leave of absence, my co-workers pitied me; like I had suffered so much only to suffer this as well. I can’t say, at that point, that I disagreed. But what bothered me most of all wasn’t my own suffering or death; it was the gaping lie I was threatening to leave behind. It was the great unsolved equation that I could not understand or conquer.

The doctors tried chemotherapy and radiation and surgery. I watched as my odds of survival shifted and wandered. They jerked and spasmed at first. But then slowly they settled down. As I got sicker and sicker, my diagnosis got clearer. The numbers were not good. I was hopeless and it seemed like the best it could do was slow things down, a bit.

As the cancer continued to rage through me, I began to see it like I saw the accounting. Chemotherapy might slow the cancer down – just like cutting benefits would – but the body would suffer terribly. The alternative would just encourage the runaway costs and when the end came it would be far more sudden.

Neither one was a winner.

And then I was entered into a trial for an immunotherapy. The results were amazing. Within weeks, I was in complete remission. A few days after that, I was back at work. I was effectively cured. My own cells had been given the tools to rescue me.

I didn’t stop thinking of the fund’s problems as a cancer. Perhaps, I imagined, some sort of immunotherapy would help. Instead of trying to force solutions from on high and trying to chase down individually replicating costs with roughly applied controls that damaged innovation and limited care, maybe something else could be done. Maybe individuals could somehow be used to drive down their own costs. Maybe, somehow, they could be empowered to create better outcomes; like white blood cells chasing down a cancer.

But I didn’t know how to do it. I threw myself into the problem, but I had no practical ideas.

It was while I was having coffee at a café – alone – that I got my answer. A mother came and sat down near me. She had her son with her.

The boy gestured towards the convenience store next door and asked “Can I have a treat?”

The mother said, “Here are two dollars. Buy whatever you want, and keep the change.”

The boy ran off like a shot. I was curious what would happen, so I stayed even after I finished my coffee. A few minutes later, the kid ran back – almost out of breath. In one hand, he held a candy car. It was marked with a prominent ‘Half Price’ sticker. In the other he held a receipt. He was proud, and he’d be taking home 75 cents in change.

The boy hadn’t had to pay for his treat. But he’d been frugal and he’d done his tiny part in driving down the cost of candy.

A moment later, I realized that was the cure I was looking for. Instead of bombarding our members with cost controls, we could empower them. If they were brought in with a suspected lump, we would figure out the median cost of getting to the next diagnosis. And then, just like the mother did, we’d pay them a bit more than that. They’d shop around for a diagnosis and keep the change. Then, they’d get to the next step. Perhaps it would be another diagnosis, with another traunch of money following to treat whatever they had. Advanced models and huge amounts of patient data would take the factors of their situation into account to determine what the mean was, and how much needed to be paid. Open, anonymous records, would enable diagnosis to be checked by freelance auditors. Finally, we’d keep receipts of whatever they spent on their care – so we could update the median cost. But they, the patients, would keep the change.

But the fund was so large, and had so many patients that each of them, with each choice, would drive down the cost of care. The median cost of treatments would drop year after year, as providers competed for business. Our patients would be frugal and providers would cut costs in order to get their business.

Just as important, we would meet our promises to them. They’d get enough money to treat their diagnosis. We wouldn’t leave them uncared for.

There would be no lies in our numbers.

I grabbed a napkin from the holder and I began to chart the effects. I couldn’t do it perfectly, you can’t really predict innovation. But there are standard models. I could see costs plummeting while services improved – just like in high-tech or in laser eye surgery. New incentives would ripple through the system and rebuild it from the ground up. The fund might just survive.

I ran to the store and bought another of the candy bars. And then I ran back to work. I skipped my desk. I skipped my manager. I just burst into the office of the man who ran the entire thing. He looked up at me. And then I held up the candy bar and I explained my idea.

He was a numbers guy. He got it. And he made it happen.

Signatures had to be gathered, a vote had to be held. People needed to be convinced. But he made it happen. And soon, it was the way the fund managed its healthcare expenses. And it worked even better than I thought it would.

Indian providers – Indian! – got into the market for our patients. They offered high quality surgeries at low prices and our patients responded. Local providers got more competitive. Clinics opened in the Bahamas. High tech got into the act. New therapies were designed – therapies designed to save money. Innovation, in delivery, in administration, in technology – exploded.

Costs, suddenly under pressure from a sort of social immunotherapy, plummeted. In the end, the fund was rescued. The lies were unwound.

Truth came back to the numbers.

A newspaper interviewed me about what I’d done. I told them the story. And then, the letters started coming in. They were letters of gratitude and of thanks. They were letters about worries lifted and fears erased. I read each of them. But I didn’t stop there. I calculated their count and colors and content and I put them up in ordered rows; bringing some bit of organization to their beautiful variety. I covered my cubicle in neatly arranged layers of letters.

And then, finally, I was promoted.

I was made a fund manager.

I wasn’t the top dog, I would never be a politician. But I was something close.

I was being recognized. I was being appreciated.

And in an odd little circle, I was finally being welcomed.

As I walked into my new office, my little cardboard box was with me. I unpacked it carefully, treating each item reverentially.

The pill box used to contain a part of my immunotherapy. It told me the concept I must aspire to.

The candy bar was the one I bought on sale from the store. It told me how I could make the concept real.

The napkin was the one I wrote on in the café, it was the revelation of what I was possible.

Together, they are the reasons I am where I am.

I place all the items on the laminated paper. The paper is a print-out of rule changes the fund members voted for. They are what made the revelation real.

And the letters, the letters taped to the walls are the thanks I have received. They are the beauty of what I have discovered.

I look it all over then and I smile yet again.

I have a new job. Here, sitting at this desk, I will take the ideas of others and I will figure out how to make them real. I will empower the members of our fund. I will be the beating heart of our organization.

I smile once more, truly happy.

My office is a tabernacle of financial immunotherapy.

Finally, I turn and pull open the door. It is time to get to work.

I have a purpose, finally, to fulfill.

———

This week’s Torah reading lays out the plan of the Mishkan (Tabernacle). G-d tells the people he wants to dwell within them. The Mishkan is a literal expression of this.

The three symbolic objects capture G-d’s revelations to the people. The burning bush is represented by the Menorah – which burns and is never consumed. It gave Moshe the ideological target of creation without destruction. The Mahn (Manna) is represented by the table with its showbread, literally the bread of faces through which G-d’s presence is revealed. And the ark represents the great revelation at Mount Sinai, where the presence of G-d was truly understood.

Together they represent the presence of Hashem.

Each is represented, in a way, by the little items on our heroine’s desk. The pill box represents the ideological target. The candy the basic concept. And the napkin the great revelation.

But the Mishkan doesn’t stop there. G-d says he wants the people to be a Mamlechet Kohanim (Kingdom of Priests) and Goy Kadosh (Holy people).

A Kingdom has rules and laws and priests draw close to G-d. This is why the Mishkan has pillars covered with curtains to form walls. There are 53 inner pillars and 56 external ones (excluding the separate gate). In the previous reading of Mishpatim, there are 53 socially enforced laws and 56 possible outcomes (three laws have two possible paths that can be chosen). The laws enable the people to drive out destruction – and thus draw close to G-d. The pillars represent the laws upheld by the people just as the rule changes on the laminated sheet do. They represent the Mamlechet Kohanim.

Finally, the inner pillars are covered by cloth with images of Keruvim – angels close to G-d ­– woven into them. The word goy is not like Mamlechet, it doesn’t unite people in rules or ruler. It is relatively formless, but still distinct. The soft curtains represent the Goy Kadosh; less structured but identifiable and close to G-d.

The letters from fund members offer related symbolism.

With this layout, G-d’s revelations are held within the people’s walls. G-d’s literal representation dwells within the representation of the people as Mamlechet Kohanim and Goy Kadosh. G-d dwells within the people.

Of course, the Mishkan doesn’t stop there. It is a place for offerings. It is a place where the physical is made spiritual. The altars fulfill that function. Likewise, the woman’s desk is a place for ideas to become real.

The Mishkan enables the physical to dwell next to the spiritual by physically rendering the spiritual and creating a space where the physical (offerings) can be converted into the spiritual. It is an interface. The heroine’s Mishkan is an interface, with physical objects representing the revelation of ideas.

Finally, the heroine is the priest of her own tabernacle. She lives with one foot in the world of men and the other in a very different world we can barely understand.

She is the one who enables her Tabernacle to function.

And just like a priest she is not the great leader. She is a specialist, focused on narrow mission.

She, like the Jewish people, is there to enable creation and innovation while combating fear and uncertainty.

She has a purpose.

She represents a sort of personal ideal for a nation of priests.

Photo from Pete Wright on UnSplash